Review: Lomography Daguerreotype Achromat 2.9/64 Lens

I have always be a fan of weird lenses and Lomography seems to be hitting the right notes when it comes to old lens design. I saw the Petzval and immediately love it to bits, then the Jupiter 3+ that I wrote a review for Techgoondu that tickled me. The only snag was the Petzval 58 that I think the variable circular bokeh didn’t really hit my sweet spot but then comes this Daguerreotype Achromat (DA) 64mm (APS-C: 96mm) at f2.9. At the time of writing, the DA lens has just concluded its very successful kickstarter campaign which I am fortunate enough to be a one of the earlier backers. I would be very happy to be surprised by the lens once it comes in December but thanks to Lomography, I got hold of this lens before that and so here’s the review.

As you can see, there are two main colours – brass/gold and black. Between the two, I very much prefer the brass look. My Petzval has aged beautifully over the months that I had it. Yes it is tarnished but that add character. In comparison, I am not so sure about peeling black paint. Some akin that to brass decolorisation but to me it looked kind of dirty or even abused. One man’s meat is another’s poison so I leave it at that.

The black version of the Daguerreotype Achromat Lens. Not a fan of the peeling paint look. And the label is printed rather than carved. I think I made the right decision after all.
Handcrafted in Central China. Not very precise in terms of location but credit is still given for the robust feel of the lens. The lens hood is a wee bit loose and won’t come out so easily as it is locked. Nothing to lose sleep over although I would love Lomo to tighten the bayonet before delivery.

Here are some differences between the Petzval and the DA lens. The aperture sits behind the lens whereas the DA aperture plates sits in front. The Petzval utilises a focusing knob and the DA lens has a focusing barrel.  Between the two focusing mechanism, the Petzval got my vote as it is easier to turn a knob than to twist. The knob also allows as little movement as possible too and having it does make it look different than your typical lens. The DA lens followed modern lens design. Perhaps that’s easier and cheaper to manufacture and most photographers are used to that anyways.

Here’s the aperture blade right in front of the lens with the lens hood taken off. Notice the thread? You can add colour filters, important for monochrome photography. Petzval aperture plates need not apply here.
The DA lens is focused via the lens barrel much like our modern lens. It is smooth with enough friction to hold the focus.
The lens cap with the carved logo.

Everyone is asking if the aperture blades of the Petzval can be used with the DA. The answer is no as the Petzval plates are thicker and you can’t slot them in. However, the Petzval can use the DA plates pretty easily although it will be loose. That can be solved by using an elastic band. More plates for the Petzval!! Yeh!!

Optically speaking the 64mm focal length is a bit weird. For a crop sensor, it is a 100mm approx so is good for portraits. For full frame sensors, 64mm can be a bit tight when compared to the 58mm Petzval. Not much but can be a hindrance if space is of premium.

So how does the images look with this lens?

Without any aperture plates, that hazy soft focus effect is in full abundance. Great for those dreamy portraiture. Focusing would be tough for mirrorless as areas that are in focus are actually not that sharp yet so it confuses the focusing system even with focus peaking. Best way is to use your optical view finder or hope that your EVF has enough resolution to help you.
Once you stopped down to F4, the sharpness and clarity returns with a suitably bokeh background. Good balance!
The same dreamy effect can be used at night too.
Like the Petzval, the aperture plates with shapes allows creativity to flourish with the bokeh effects
Here’s another one at night with the cross shape plates that creates that painted look.
The DA lens has a very unique flare as seen here.

 

During my own tests, members from my photography group – Singapore Photography Interest Network get to test it too. Once you can get the flare and the exposure right, the effect is pretty good.Credit – Chandra with Sony A7
Here’s another example by Teo Sock Mui with Nikon D750 of Chris Cusick. Once you are used to the focusing mechanism with a DSLR, it is pretty easy to get a good focus. Here you can see the circular bokeh just like the Petzval but not as  pronounced.

The lens is quite versatile and due to its smaller size, easier to bring around than the Petzval. If you add the ability to take in filters, the DA lens gave a much better value overall. If you do like the circular bokeh like the Petzval, the DA sometimes show hint of it only when you are deliberate with looking for complex background such as green foliage.

Right now the Daguerreotype Achromat lens Kickstarter campaign has been completed and received overwhelming support garnering over US$900,000 of start up funds.  You can also preorder the lens but it will be delivered only after Christmas unfortunately. Is this worth the wait? The short answer is yes and photographers will have another lens in their arsenal to create more unique images for their subjects.

To see the images in better resolution, click on to the flickr folder.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s